Regent Intel operates as the Security Professional within the ESRM model — identifying and assessing security risk, presenting mitigation options to the asset owner, and executing the program they approve. Whether we extend your existing security function or become it entirely, the role is the same: trusted advisor, subject matter expert, and practitioner.
The ESRM framework defines the Security Professional as the trusted advisor and subject matter expert who guides asset owners through the risk decision-making process. Regent Intel fills that role — either alongside your existing security function, or as the function itself.
Your CSO or security director owns the ESRM relationship internally. You need specialized capability you don't have in-house: intelligence-trained investigators, TSCM, executive protection operators with government backgrounds, or the analytic depth to support your risk assessments. Regent Intel plugs into your existing governance structure, reports through your chain, and delivers capability that extends your program without duplicating your role.
Principals, family offices, executives, and smaller organizations without a dedicated security function. Regent Intel fills the entire Security Professional role: we identify the assets that matter most, assess the risks to those assets, present mitigation options with clear analysis, and execute and monitor the program you approve. You make the risk decisions. We do everything else.
The four-phase ESRM cycle governs every Regent Intel advisory engagement. This is not a one-time assessment. It is a continuous loop that adapts as the threat landscape, organizational priorities, and operating environment evolve.
We catalogue what matters most — people, operations, facilities, information, reputation — and map each asset against your mission and priorities. Ownership is assigned. The asset owner is the risk owner. We advise; they decide what gets protected first.
For each asset, we identify the threats and vulnerabilities that could cause harm. Digital footprint, travel patterns, insider risk, physical exposure, adversarial intent — assessed through intelligence-grade methodology and scored for likelihood and impact. Risks are ranked by priority, not assumed equal.
For each prioritized risk, we develop mitigation options — accept, avoid, transfer, or reduce — and present them to the asset owner with cost, timeline, and expected risk reduction. The asset owner decides the appropriate risk appetite and approves the mitigation. We design and deploy the program: EP details, TSCM sweeps, travel security, intelligence monitoring, or any combination the risk picture requires.
Intelligence collection runs continuously. We monitor for changes in the threat landscape, conduct periodic reassessments, incorporate incident learning, and report on risk posture and control effectiveness. The program adjusts as conditions evolve. Every action is documented. Every decision is defensible and auditable.
Every deliverable is structured for the audience that needs it — whether that is a board risk committee, a general counsel, a family office director, or the principal themselves. Documentation is not an afterthought. It is a core discipline.
Catalogued assets, identified threats, scored risks, and prioritized treatment recommendations. The foundation of the ESRM program and the basis for every resource allocation decision.
Documented mitigation strategy for each prioritized risk: controls selected, rationale, cost-benefit analysis, asset owner approval, and implementation timeline.
Regular intelligence products covering emerging threats, changes in the risk landscape, escalation indicators, and recommended adjustments to the security posture.
Quarterly or periodic reports on risk posture, control effectiveness, residual risk trends, and program performance — structured for board presentation, audit committee review, or fiduciary oversight.
The practitioners who fill the Security Professional role at Regent Intel each came from a distinct discipline — OGA programs, Army intelligence, special operations, Treasury financial investigations, and FBI investigative work. That integration is what the methodology reflects, and it is why the advisory capability operates at a level most firms cannot replicate.
No comparable firm has integrated all five disciplines. Most operate in a single lane. Regent Intel was built at the intersection of all of them — and the advisory practice reflects every one.
All inquiries are handled with complete confidentiality.
Regent Intel